|
 |
Cockles Quota Allocation |
Return to
Policies
November 2008
Over the past
few months Ann has received numerous letters and telephone calls
from cockle fishermen concerned about how they would be impacted
upon by the Government’s proposed regulation of the Murray and
Lower Lakes Pipi Fishery and the Coffin Bay mud cockle fishery.
(West Coast and Section Bank are other mud cockle zones where
the same concerns exist).
Although these
are two distinct fisheries, there were recurring themes in these
complaints.
Both resources
have a history of vulnerability to overfishing, and this has
been exacerbated by the price of cockles rising sharply in
recent years.
Due to concerns about the sustainability of the fishery, all
involved realised that a quota system needed to be implemented.
There was a lot of consultation about how the quota would be
divided up, but many fishermen remain deeply dissatisfied with
the process. For example, there is anger that only selective
information was taken into account in the determination of quota
allocations, the process was not transparent and that fishermen
were intimidated or ignored at public meetings. Earlier this
year the Minister tabled regulations as to how the quota would
be divided up in both these fisheries, but a number of cockle
fishermen have contacted MP’s asking that they be disallowed as
this was not fair and equitable, and was going to inflict severe
financial hardship. A number of fishermen have claimed that they
will go bankrupt as a result of their allocation not being
sufficient enough to maintain their business.
It has also been alleged by some West Coast fishermen that the
main beneficiaries of the allocated quota had benefited from
privileged information several years ago, and aware that the
fishery was going to a quota system based on catch history,
worked flat out to bolster theirs, thus giving them an advantage
over other license holders.
Given the above complains, and the supporting paperwork that was
produced, there seemed to be something worth investigating and
this needed to be investigated before the regulations were
allowed.
The Liberal Party’s Shadow Minister, Mitch Williams MP,
reaffirmed complaints that were received and on his behalf the
Hon. Caroline Schaefer moved a motion to disallow the
regulations for the Coorong and Lower Lakes Fishery. To read
Caroline Shaefer's speech when introducing the motion please
click
here. Those who
voted for the disallowance are listed below:
-
Hon J. Dawkins (Liberal)
-
Hon R. Lawson (Liberal)
-
Hon M. Lensink (Liberal)
-
Hon R. Lucas (Liberal)
-
Hon D. Ridgway (Liberal)
-
Hon C. Schaefer (Liberal)
-
Hon T. Stephens (Liberal)
-
Hon S. Wade (Liberal)
-
Hon S. Kanck (Democrats)
-
Hon D. Hood (Family First)
-
Hon A. Bressington (Independent)
This could have resulted in one of three scenarios:
1.
The Minister, the Hon Rory McEwen could have reinstated
the regulations the following day; or
2.
The Minster, the Hon Rory McEwen could have taken into
consideration the concerns of the fishermen and parliamentarians
and considered alterations to the regulations to allow all
fisherman to be able to make a living and provide a quota that
would also allow sustainability of the resource; or
3.
Choose to open the fishery with the suspended regulations
with the rules that applied last year.
The Minister chose the latter.
Ann introduced a motion in the Legislative Council for an
inquiry into the conduct of PIRSA in this process and following
amendments by the Hon Caroline Schaefer it was passed on
Thursday, 27 November 2008. Those who voted for the Select
Committee are listed below:
-
Hon T. Stephens (Liberal)
-
Hon D. Ridgway (Liberal)
-
Hon J. Dawkins (Liberal)
-
Hon R. Lucas (Liberal)
-
Hon C. Schaefer (Liberal)
-
Hon R. Lawson (Liberal)
-
Hon S. Wade (Liberal)
-
Hon M. Lensink (Liberal)
-
Hon D. Hood (Family First)
-
Hon R. Brokenshire (Family First)
-
Hon A. Bressington (Independent)
The Terms of Reference for the Select Committee are as
follows:-
That a select committee of the Legislative Council inquire
into and report upon the conduct by PIRSA:
In relation to issues affecting the livelihoods of those
involved in the fishing of mud cockles in the Marine Scalefish
Fishery and the Lakes and Coorong Pipi Fishery and, in
particular-
(a) (i) the license fee structure;
(ii) cost recovery process for fishers
(iii) access
to right of appeal process
(b) The scientific date provided to PIRSA to determine
allocations to ensure resource sustainability for the 2008-09
quotas for mud cockles in the Marine Scalefish Fishery and the
Lakes and Coorong Pipi Fishery;
(c) The validity and accuracy of catch and effort data and
the impact that has on scientific stock assessment to guarantee
resource allocation;
(d) The rationale of determining allocation for season quota
2008-09 and the impact that that has had on individual license
holders and multiple license holders; and
(e) Any other relevant matter.
The Select Committee will consist of:
·
Hon John Dawkins MLC (Liberal),
·
Hon Caroline Schaefer (Liberal),
·
Hon Ian Hunter (Labor)
·
Hon Russell Wortley (Labor)
·
Hon Ann Bressington (Independent).
It will have power to send for persons, papers and records, and
to adjourn from place to place, and is to report on 17 June
2009. Those that raised their concerns with the process will now
be able to lay their cards on the table at meetings for this
inquiry. Ann is hopeful that these concerns can be
satisfactorily resolved in the best interests of license holders
and the long-term future of both fisheries.
It was and still is Ann’s firm belief that if an inquiry into
PIRSA shows that all processes were carried out and outcomes
achieved were transparent and equitable the regulations should
proceed unhindered. However, if evidence presented shows that
the concerns of fishermen were valid then recommendations will
be made to improve the function of PIRSA and will also be used
to advise the Minister on issues that need to be addressed.
As with any contentious issue there are always two sides to the
story and as part of our democratic system of government it is
fair and reasonable to investigate any and all allegations that
are put before Members of Parliament that
might negatively
impact on constituents of this state. It would be unthinkable
that a parliamentary process, such as a Select Committee Inquiry
did not go ahead when there are so many unanswered questions and
allegations relating to the future of an entire industry.
Latest News
On the 8th of September 2009, the report of the Select
Committee into the Conduct of PIRSA in Fishing of Mud Cockles
in Marine Scalefish and Lakes and Coorong Pipi Fisheries
was finalised and presented the Legislative Council. To access
the report please click
here.
Following this, the members who sat on the Committee each
briefly spoke to the report. To read Ann's contribution please
click
here.
The Independent Weekly subsequently covered the report and its
findings in the article
Two Sides to Bivalve Battle.
Related Media Releases:
12 February 2009 - Your Fishery, Your Say
23 October 2008 - Minister of Plenty Screws the Little Guy Again
|